Error analysis in teaching combinatorics: the development of prospective teachers’ confidence and problem-solving skills

Abstract

This study investigates the pedagogical potential of error analysis in the teaching of combinatorics within mathematics teacher education. Building on previous research that highlights the role of incorrectly worked sample solutions in cognitive, metacognitive, and affective learning processes, we conducted a mixed-methods study with prospective mathematics teachers at Eötvös Loránd University. Quantitative results from Likert-scale questionnaires (n = 26) indicate that regular analysis of incorrectly worked solutions substantially enhanced participants’ self-confidence, strengthened their problem-solving skills, and positively shaped their attitudes toward future teaching practice. Complementary qualitative data, analyzed through grounded theory, revealed five interrelated categories – self-reflection and confidence, discernment, deeper understanding, methodological surplus, and combinatorial surplus – that together explain the mechanisms through which error analysis supports professional growth. The findings suggest that systematic analysis of conceptual errors not only improves problem-solving competence but also fosters self-confidence, self-reflection, and teaching-related attitudes. By comparing our emergent model of error-analysis thinking with Schoenfeld’s problem-solving framework, we argue that “discernment” constitutes a distinctive and central dimension of error-based learning. The study contributes both theoretically, by refining models of mathematical problem solving, and practically, by offering concrete recommendations for integrating error analysis into mathematics teacher education curricula. Subject Classification: 97C30, 97K20, 97D40, 97C70, 97C99