Comparison of the methods and a model for the evaluation of the readiness in implementing business intelligence projects: a hybrid approach

A tétel rövid nézete
dc.contributor.advisorPokorádi, László
dc.contributor.authorFarrokhi, Vahid
dc.contributor.departmentInformatikai tudományok doktori iskolahu
dc.contributor.submitterdepDE--Informatikai Kar -- Informatikai Rendszerek és Hálózatok Tanszék
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-07T06:59:46Z
dc.date.available2017-04-07T06:59:46Z
dc.date.created2017hu_HU
dc.date.defended2017-09-21
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, Business Intelligence (BI) systems have consistently been rated as one of the highest priorities of Information Systems (IS) and of business leaders. BI allows firms to apply information to support their processes and decisions by combining its capabilities in both organizational and technical issues. A significant portion of companies’ IT budgets is being spent on BI and related technologies. In spite of these investments, the risk of failure in implementing is high and only 24% of BI implementations are identified as being very successful. Hence, the evaluation of BI readiness is vital because it serves two important goals. First, it reveals gap areas where a company is not ready to proceed with its BI efforts, so by identifying BI readiness gaps, wasting time and resources can be avoided. Second, the evaluation points out what we need to close the gaps and implement BI with a high possibility of success. This dissertation presents an overview of BI and the necessities for the evaluation of the readiness, and a comparative analysis of the evaluation methods and identifying and ranking the right methods which can be applied in building a model to assess the readiness of organizations. There are many Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods and other further methods which can be applied for building a model of evaluation but each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages. By combining and integrating these methods with each other and also with various other methods, we can avoid the disadvantages and improve the model of evaluation. We also examine the MCDM methods in the other unrelated area to show their applicability in order to confirm the validity of our approach in applying these methods for the comparison of the techniques and methods. In addition, we provide important and critical success factors and classify them into two main categories; organizational and technical. Finally, we show the process of building the hybrid model by using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Graph Theory and Matrix Approach (GTMA) and examine it in a real company as a case study.hu_HU
dc.description.correctorNE
dc.format.extent119hu_HU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2437/236523
dc.language.isoenhu_HU
dc.subjectBusiness Intelligencehu_HU
dc.subjectMCDM methods
dc.subjectCritical Success Factors
dc.subject.disciplineInformatikai tudományokhu
dc.subject.sciencefieldMűszaki tudományokhu
dc.titleComparison of the methods and a model for the evaluation of the readiness in implementing business intelligence projects: a hybrid approachhu_HU
dc.title.translatedMódszerek összehasonlítása és egy modell a Business Intelligence projektek megvalósítására való alkalmasság felmérésére: egy hibrid megközelítéshu_HU
Fájlok
Eredeti köteg (ORIGINAL bundle)
Megjelenítve 1 - 2 (Összesen 2)
Nincs kép
Név:
Vahid_Farrohki_Dissertation_titkositott.pdf
Méret:
2.13 MB
Formátum:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Leírás:
dissertation
Letöltés
Nincs kép
Név:
Vahid_Farrohki_Booklet_titkositott.pdf
Méret:
1.38 MB
Formátum:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Leírás:
booklet
Letöltés
Engedélyek köteg
Megjelenítve 1 - 1 (Összesen 1)
Nincs kép
Név:
license.txt
Méret:
1.93 KB
Formátum:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Leírás:
Letöltés
Gyűjtemények
Informatikai Tudományok Doktori Iskola