Comparative analysis of alternative dispute resolution methods in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the European Union

A tétel rövid nézete
dc.contributor.advisorFézer , Tamás
dc.contributor.authorMukanbetov, Azim
dc.contributor.departmentDE--Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-25T07:45:55Z
dc.date.available2023-05-25T07:45:55Z
dc.date.created2023-05-24
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the European Union (EU). The study examines the legal framework, institutional structures and practical implementation of ADR in both jurisdictions. Based on the analysis of relevant legislation, case studies and academic research, the thesis highlights the similarities and differences in ADR practice between Kazakhstan and the EU. Key areas of focus include mediation, arbitration and negotiation. The results shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of ADR systems in each context, providing valuable information for policy makers, practitioners and stakeholders interested in improving ADR methods both in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the European Union.
dc.description.courseEuropean and International Business Law
dc.description.degreeMSc/MA
dc.format.extent38
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2437/354207
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectADR
dc.subjectComparative analysis
dc.subjectalternative dispute resolution
dc.subjectarbitration
dc.subjectmediation
dc.subjectnegotiation
dc.subjectADR in the EU
dc.subjectADR in the Kazakhstan
dc.subject.dspaceDEENK Témalista::Jogtudomány
dc.titleComparative analysis of alternative dispute resolution methods in the Republic of Kazakhstan and in the European Union
Fájlok
Gyűjtemények
Theses (ÁJK)