államfők nemzetközi büntetőjogi felelősségre vonásának mai keretei

dc.contributor.authorPapp, Nikolett
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T11:52:37Z
dc.date.available2021-06-28T11:52:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-31
dc.description.abstractRecent years the legal position of Heads of State and other very senior State representatives has received considerable attention from national and international courts, writers and practitioners. It is often said that the establishment of the ad hoc tribunals and the International Criminal Court, reflects a growing belief that the heads of State should be held accountable for serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. It has been argued that international law is now the stage where immunity should no longer apply in relation to serious international crimes. By contrast, others have emphasized the political and practical difficulties inherent in allowing national courts to serve as a tool for the transnational enforcement of penalties or damages for crimes committed abroad by the leaders and officials of foreign States. The resulting controversy has led the International Law Commission to include the topic ‘Immunity of State officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdictions’ in its work programme. In my study I present the development of status of the Heads of State in international law, especially the criminal liability in the XX-XXI. Centuries. In this study I exhibit the development of the legal status of the heads of State and the actual questions in international law related to the criminal liability of heads of State and other senior State officials.en
dc.description.abstractRecent years the legal position of Heads of State and other very senior State representatives has received considerable attention from national and international courts, writers and practitioners. It is often said that the establishment of the ad hoc tribunals and the International Criminal Court, reflects a growing belief that the heads of State should be held accountable for serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law. It has been argued that international law is now the stage where immunity should no longer apply in relation to serious international crimes. By contrast, others have emphasized the political and practical difficulties inherent in allowing national courts to serve as a tool for the transnational enforcement of penalties or damages for crimes committed abroad by the leaders and officials of foreign States. The resulting controversy has led the International Law Commission to include the topic ‘Immunity of State officials from Foreign Criminal Jurisdictions’ in its work programme. In my study I present the development of status of the Heads of State in international law, especially the criminal liability in the XX-XXI. Centuries. In this study I exhibit the development of the legal status of the heads of State and the actual questions in international law related to the criminal liability of heads of State and other senior State officials.hu
dc.identifier.citationDebreceni Jogi Műhely, Évf. 13 szám 3-4 (2016) , 40-52
dc.identifier.eissn1786-5158
dc.identifier.issn1787-775X
dc.identifier.issue3-4
dc.identifier.jatitleDJM
dc.identifier.jtitleDebreceni Jogi Műhely
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2437/318545en
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.languagehu
dc.relationhttps://ojs.lib.unideb.hu/DJM/article/view/6675
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.rights.ownerDebreceni Jogi Műhely
dc.titleállamfők nemzetközi büntetőjogi felelősségre vonásának mai kereteihu
dc.typefolyóiratcikkhu
dc.typearticleen
Fájlok