Vlaamse Beweging en de patstelling van het Nederlands in de publieke overheid en het onderwijs in het jonge België (1830–1850)

dc.contributor.authorFabry, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T19:50:58Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T19:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-30
dc.description.abstractAlthough the freedom of language use was anchored in the Belgian Constitution of 1831, in practice it led to almost complete Frenchification of public life, because civil servants could choose their own language. Dutch thus became the language of the countryside and the lower classes. Secondary and higher education were exclusively French speaking. The Flemish Movement came into being as a reaction to this. Cultural associations were founded and standards for Dutch language established. A petition in 1840 revealed the extent of the problem – the Flemish Movement demanded language equality and the establishment of a Flemish Academy. Although there was partial success in 1850 (Dutchification of primary and secondary education in Flanders), the petition also provoked a hostile reaction among French speakers who accused the Flemings of antibelgitude. The Flemish Movement therefore issued a pro-Belgian manifesto. But the government remained French speaking, so there was a stalemate.de
dc.description.abstractAlthough the freedom of language use was anchored in the Belgian Constitution of 1831, in practice it led to almost complete Frenchification of public life, because civil servants could choose their own language. Dutch thus became the language of the countryside and the lower classes. Secondary and higher education were exclusively French speaking. The Flemish Movement came into being as a reaction to this. Cultural associations were founded and standards for Dutch language established. A petition in 1840 revealed the extent of the problem – the Flemish Movement demanded language equality and the establishment of a Flemish Academy. Although there was partial success in 1850 (Dutchification of primary and secondary education in Flanders), the petition also provoked a hostile reaction among French speakers who accused the Flemings of antibelgitude. The Flemish Movement therefore issued a pro-Belgian manifesto. But the government remained French speaking, so there was a stalemate.en
dc.description.abstractAlthough the freedom of language use was anchored in the Belgian Constitution of 1831, in practice it led to almost complete Frenchification of public life, because civil servants could choose their own language. Dutch thus became the language of the countryside and the lower classes. Secondary and higher education were exclusively French speaking. The Flemish Movement came into being as a reaction to this. Cultural associations were founded and standards for Dutch language established. A petition in 1840 revealed the extent of the problem – the Flemish Movement demanded language equality and the establishment of a Flemish Academy. Although there was partial success in 1850 (Dutchification of primary and secondary education in Flanders), the petition also provoked a hostile reaction among French speakers who accused the Flemings of antibelgitude. The Flemish Movement therefore issued a pro-Belgian manifesto. But the government remained French speaking, so there was a stalemate.hu
dc.description.abstractAlthough the freedom of language use was anchored in the Belgian Constitution of 1831, in practice it led to almost complete Frenchification of public life, because civil servants could choose their own language. Dutch thus became the language of the countryside and the lower classes. Secondary and higher education were exclusively French speaking. The Flemish Movement came into being as a reaction to this. Cultural associations were founded and standards for Dutch language established. A petition in 1840 revealed the extent of the problem – the Flemish Movement demanded language equality and the establishment of a Flemish Academy. Although there was partial success in 1850 (Dutchification of primary and secondary education in Flanders), the petition also provoked a hostile reaction among French speakers who accused the Flemings of antibelgitude. The Flemish Movement therefore issued a pro-Belgian manifesto. But the government remained French speaking, so there was a stalemate.nl
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationActa Neerlandica, Nr 19 (2022) , 47-58
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.36392/ACTANEERL/2022/19/4
dc.identifier.eissn3004-1740
dc.identifier.issn1587-8171
dc.identifier.issue19
dc.identifier.jatitleAN
dc.identifier.jtitleActa Neerlandica
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2437/375940
dc.languagenl
dc.relationhttps://ojs.lib.unideb.hu/actaneer/article/view/13374
dc.rights.accessOpen Access
dc.rights.ownerActa Neerlandica
dc.subjectDutchen
dc.subjectBelgiumen
dc.subjectstalemateen
dc.subjectlanguage useen
dc.subjectFlemish Movementen
dc.subjectestablishmenten
dc.subjectFrench-speakersen
dc.subjectDutchhu
dc.subjectBelgiumhu
dc.subjectstalematehu
dc.subjectlanguage usehu
dc.subjectFlemish Movementhu
dc.subjectestablishmenthu
dc.subjectFrench-speakershu
dc.subjectDutchde
dc.subjectBelgiumde
dc.subjectstalematede
dc.subjectlanguage usede
dc.subjectFlemish Movementde
dc.subjectestablishmentde
dc.subjectFrench-speakersde
dc.subjectDutchnl
dc.subjectBelgiumnl
dc.subjectstalematenl
dc.subjectlanguage usenl
dc.subjectFlemish Movementnl
dc.subjectestablishmentnl
dc.subjectFrench-speakersnl
dc.titleVlaamse Beweging en de patstelling van het Nederlands in de publieke overheid en het onderwijs in het jonge België (1830–1850)nl
dc.typefolyóiratcikkhu
dc.typearticleen
Fájlok
Eredeti köteg (ORIGINAL bundle)
Megjelenítve 1 - 1 (Összesen 1)
Nincs kép
Név:
pdf (Dutch)
Méret:
302.47 KB
Formátum:
Adobe Portable Document Format