Reflexivisation and Passivization in the Standard Theory and in Goverment and Binding Theory

A tétel rövid nézete
dc.contributor.advisorLaczkó, Tibor
dc.contributor.authorVarga, Renáta
dc.contributor.departmentDE--TEK--Bölcsészettudományi Karhu_HU
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-29T14:56:12Z
dc.date.available2013-05-29T14:56:12Z
dc.date.created2009-04-08
dc.date.issued2013-05-29T14:56:12Z
dc.description.abstractI will compare the Standard Theory with Government and Binding Theory to find similarities and differences in their treatment of reflexivisation and passivisation. The two syntactic theories have been developed by Noam Chomsky, the founding father of generative grammar. A generative grammar is a grammar that contains syntactic, semantic, morphological and phonological rules stating how to form, interpret and pronounce sentences (Radford 1988: 21). The aim of this chapter is manyfold. First, we will present the architectures of the theories, and explain how the two theories generate sentences. Second, we will point out an important difference between the theories. Thirdly, we will give a detailed discussion of the seven subtheories of Government and Binding Theory, the theory that has been developed from the Standard Theory. Finally, we will summarise the discussion in section 4.hu_HU
dc.description.courseangol nyelv és irodalomhu_HU
dc.description.degreeegyetemihu_HU
dc.format.extent66hu_HU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2437/169769
dc.language.isoenhu_HU
dc.rights.accessiphu_HU
dc.subjectgenerative grammarhu_HU
dc.subjectgovenrment and bindinghu_HU
dc.subject.dspaceDEENK Témalista::Nyelvtudomány::Nyelvészethu_HU
dc.titleReflexivisation and Passivization in the Standard Theory and in Goverment and Binding Theoryhu_HU
dc.typediplomamunka
Fájlok
Gyűjtemények
Theses (Institute of English and American Studies)