The Story is not Over

dc.contributor.advisorPelyvás, Péter
dc.contributor.authorGömöri, János
dc.contributor.departmentDE--TEK--Bölcsészettudományi Karhu_HU
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-14T11:36:38Z
dc.date.available2013-06-14T11:36:38Z
dc.date.created2009-12-14
dc.date.issued2013-06-14T11:36:38Z
dc.description.abstractMany authors of books about prepositions note that the investigations of prepositions before 1980s was relatively scarce. Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt speaks about the preposition as “a lexical category which had long been neglected in linguistic inquiry” in the introduction of “The Semantics of Prepositions” (Zelinsky-Wibbelt 1). Expressed in the entry about adpositions in the Encyclopedia of Linguistics, D Kurzon’s opinion is that “the grammatical treatment of adpositions has undergone considerable change over the last three decades or so. In traditional approaches, the adposition was viewed merely as a minor word class consisting of a small set of words; it was very often treated briefly within a page or so” (Brown 63). Are prepositions merely connectors of other words? Are they connectors without meaning? In this introductory chapter, two of the most important distinctions will be addressed: the homonymy/polysemy and the closed-class—open-class. Before starting a study, analysts of prepositions need to decide about the above distinctions and these decisions will have a huge impact on the analysis... (Introduction)hu_HU
dc.description.courseangol nyelv és irodalomhu_HU
dc.description.degreeegyetemihu_HU
dc.format.extent43hu_HU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2437/170912
dc.language.isoenhu_HU
dc.rights.accessiphu_HU
dc.subjectEnglish languagehu_HU
dc.subjectprepositionshu_HU
dc.subjectsemanticshu_HU
dc.subjectcognitive grammarhu_HU
dc.subject.dspaceDEENK Témalista::Nyelvtudomány::Nyelvészethu_HU
dc.titleThe Story is not Overhu_HU
dc.title.subtitleAgainst: The Principal Polysemy Approachhu_HU
dc.typediplomamunka
Fájlok