MFN Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties of South Asian Countries: An Analysis

dc.contributor.advisorBartha, Ildikó
dc.contributor.authorShuvo, Md Atekul Islam Nur
dc.contributor.departmentDE--Állam- és Jogtudományi Karhu_HU
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-01T16:36:35Z
dc.date.available2022-01-01T16:36:35Z
dc.date.created2021-12-30
dc.description.abstractA number of Bilateral Investment Treaties have been signed with South Asian countries (BITs). MFN clauses were added in these treaties, and they were construed extremely broadly, allowing investors to borrow favorable dispute settlement measures from third-country BITs. When disagreements emerge, this dynamic policy tool allows investors to cherry select more favorable treatment from third-party BITs under the cover of wide interpretation. In the sphere of international trade law, where the traditional use of MFN attempted to provide substantive protection, this provision is applied in the domain of investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms for both substantive and procedural treatment. Furthermore, the MFN clause is utilized to get around a number of prerequisites for establishing official international arbitration. For this, MFN provision is widely used to get a quick remedy with ambiguous interpretations. The author, in this article, will try to indicate the area of the problem of using the MFN provisions in the context of shortening the waiting period, widening the jurisdictions etc.hu_HU
dc.description.courseLLMhu_HU
dc.description.degreeMSc/MAhu_HU
dc.format.extent56hu_HU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2437/327252
dc.language.isoenhu_HU
dc.subjectBilateral Investment Treatieshu_HU
dc.subjectMFN Clauses in South Asian Investment Treatieshu_HU
dc.subjectJurisdictionhu_HU
dc.subjectBIThu_HU
dc.subjectWaiting periodhu_HU
dc.subject.dspaceDEENK Témalista::Jogtudományhu_HU
dc.titleMFN Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties of South Asian Countries: An Analysishu_HU
Fájlok
Gyűjtemények