Collingwood – Re-enactment
| dc.contributor.author | Gyáni, Gábor | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-22T20:58:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-22T20:58:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-06-27 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Robin G. Collingwood, a British archeologist and philosopher, elaborated on the so-called notion of re-enactment. In his main theoretical work, the Idea of History, published posthumously, the editor placed an argument in the “Epilogue” in which Collingwood detailed this concept. `The truly historicist epistemological idea of re-enactment was closely connected to another one of his arguments concerning the epistemological importance of the question and answer. According to the latter, when a historian tries to find out the precise meaning of a textual testimony coming from the past, he/she must also know the question to which the historical actor addressed his/her response, and what it meant, as they are correlative. Collingwood’s historical epistemology, an extreme version of historicism, generated contrasting reactions: several theoreticians (e.g. W. H. Dray) and historians (e.g. Q. Skinner) adopt it unreservedly; there are, however, thinkers, like H. G. Gadamer in particular, who in the name of philosophical hermeneutics, reject it altogether. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Robin G. Collingwood, a British archeologist and philosopher, elaborated on the so-called notion of re-enactment. In his main theoretical work, the Idea of History, published posthumously, the editor placed an argument in the “Epilogue” in which Collingwood detailed this concept. `The truly historicist epistemological idea of re-enactment was closely connected to another one of his arguments concerning the epistemological importance of the question and answer. According to the latter, when a historian tries to find out the precise meaning of a textual testimony coming from the past, he/she must also know the question to which the historical actor addressed his/her response, and what it meant, as they are correlative. Collingwood’s historical epistemology, an extreme version of historicism, generated contrasting reactions: several theoreticians (e.g. W. H. Dray) and historians (e.g. Q. Skinner) adopt it unreservedly; there are, however, thinkers, like H. G. Gadamer in particular, who in the name of philosophical hermeneutics, reject it altogether. | hu |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Studia Litteraria, Évf. 63 szám 3–4 (2024): Újrajátszások: Emlékezés, megidézés, átértelmezés a művészetekben , 8–15. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.37415/studia/2024/63/14545 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2063-1049 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0562-2867 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3–4 | |
| dc.identifier.jatitle | Stud.litt. | |
| dc.identifier.jtitle | Studia Litteraria | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2437/376576 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 63 | |
| dc.language | hu | |
| dc.relation | https://ojs.lib.unideb.hu/studia/article/view/14545 | |
| dc.rights.access | Open Access | |
| dc.title | Collingwood – Re-enactment | hu |
| dc.type | folyóiratcikk | hu |
| dc.type | article | en |
Fájlok
Eredeti köteg (ORIGINAL bundle)
1 - 1 (Összesen 1)